STOVE Lounge

You really only pick out things that deserve to be cursed at

congrats

congrats

It is against the real thing, it is against the real thing, it is against the law.議性，於此此舉作用濫用結帳的方式來定義，何來的濫用結帳?
濫用結帳應該是在指 刷卡 後 拿 擬 臺 方 申 以 無 無 無 無 拿 拿
今天在官方與GASH金流平台的值頁面進行儲值，且也扣款也Is it possible to buy and sell without entering the market?
( https://mwpayment-lordnine.gashpoint.com/MiddleWareWeb/?content_id=89974dba-3d42-4703-ad31-ec37293f32ef )
The law is regulated and regulated. GASH meeting, one-stop opening, multiple openings, no openings GASH Is it possible to find a place to buy and sell?
Large road reversal type, large road, high road, special time, local road, medium-sized road, flower, etc. Multi-temporal, multi-regional, local, autonomous, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, mobile, etc. It is a limited time limit for the business world, and it is possible to use the money in the financial market. It's the first time, it's the first time, it's better to change your mind, it's better to change it later.
After opening the house, it is said that it is a year, and it is said that it is possible to enter a large number of households. The question is: Do you want to buy a car on a flat surface for commercial use?
當然是不是也有不少人用這式去刷這一年來所出的各種限量Is the price of the product reasonable? Is it currently available to people?

I am not talking about many people, I am not talking about my family, I am alone.

It is possible to change the market, change the market, change the market, and expand the market.
34-Year-Old Royal Family, 34-Year-Old Royal Family, Super High-Quality Money-Rate, 34-Year-Old Family幾十萬，隨便一隻大課長花費就上百萬台幣，只能說真的是手賤倒霉背黑鍋。

Is it a legal business? It's a legal system, it's a test case, it's a big money market, it's expensive, it's expensive. After the war in Korea?
---

[Korean translation]

There is clearly something wrong with overbuying in this case, but the official punishment is very controversial. I can't understand why there is such an interpretation of what is defined as "payment abuse."

"Payment Abuse" means that after making a card payment and receiving a virtual item, you request a refund from the backend and receive the item for free. But today, if you make a payment on an official or GASH payment platform and there is no notification or warning about over-purchase even though the payment was made, is this really the consumer's or player's responsibility?

(Payment page example: GASH payment page)

The overall process and procedure are very normal and simple. Just open several web pages, select GASH membership points deduction, click tens or hundreds at a time, and then enter each payment password one by one. Can this method really be called "abusing payment by drilling holes"?

When big consumers pay a lot of money in these games, it takes a lot of time, and they look for a fast payment method to process it efficiently. It is true that this method saved time when recharging unlimited diamonds or paying for certain paid items in the past. That is why the payment was made using this method. This problem has not been solved yet, and the limited biweekly gift package can still be paid infinitely in the same way.

It's been a year since the game was released, and many players used this method to recharge high-value diamonds, and there were no problems at the time. Are you now shifting all the blame for the game company and platform's errors onto the consumers?

Of course, there are people who have paid for limited-time special packages this way several times over the past year, or who are still paying this way several times now. I will not say anything more about that.

Ultimately, some workshops that used the "Packet to Get Starlight Coupons for Free" suffered damages due to situations involving incorrect use of the packet.

This is an unreasonable punishment that 34 players have had their accounts suspended for a year. The amount of money that 34 people overpaid is only a few hundred thousand won, but some big consumers have paid more than a million Taiwan dollars. It is really unfortunate that we are being punished wrongly.

With these game companies and this kind of handling, will there be any desire to play or spend a lot of money in the future? Should we continue the “game war”? Should streamers continue to promote game companies? Are game company promotions ultimately stealing money from consumers?